Talk:UK's most-read papers found to be in contempt of court

Too much sandwiching of text between the photos and the pull quotes. Everything seems squeezed. Just my opinion! Mattisse (talk) 01:21, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

Review of revision 1189969 [Passed]

Revision 1189969 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 03:23, 6 March 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1189969 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 03:23, 6 March 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.