Talk:US Senator Joseph Lieberman speaks at Republican National Convention

Revision 687955 of this article has been reviewed by ShakataGaNai (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 04:14, 3 September 2008 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Not ready: I'm not sure. What is the end goal of this article? There are several sections of speech, but not much more. Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Not ready: Needs some sort of wrap up after the last quote, right now it looks feels incomplete Comments by reviewer: I'm also very confused by "took shots at his own (former) party, and their candidate, Senator Barack Obama:". Is he taking shots at Dem's? Isn't he a dem? But that isn't his former party? --ShakataGaNai ^_^ 04:14, 3 September 2008 (UTC) Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 687955 of this article has been reviewed by ShakataGaNai (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 04:14, 3 September 2008 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Not ready: I'm not sure. What is the end goal of this article? There are several sections of speech, but not much more. Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Not ready: Needs some sort of wrap up after the last quote, right now it looks feels incomplete Comments by reviewer: I'm also very confused by "took shots at his own (former) party, and their candidate, Senator Barack Obama:". Is he taking shots at Dem's? Isn't he a dem? But that isn't his former party? --ShakataGaNai ^_^ 04:14, 3 September 2008 (UTC) Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

I'll take the "former" out; I was referring to his status as an independent, though he still caucuses with the democrats. JeremyMcCracken (talk) 04:26, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Review 2

Revision 687982 of this article has been reviewed by ShakataGaNai (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 06:18, 3 September 2008 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: I'm happy, makes much more sense. --ShakataGaNai ^_^ 06:18, 3 September 2008 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 687982 of this article has been reviewed by ShakataGaNai (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 06:18, 3 September 2008 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: I'm happy, makes much more sense. --ShakataGaNai ^_^ 06:18, 3 September 2008 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.